Improve Well-Being with Mindfulness
By John M. de Castro, Ph.D.
“We believe that mindfulness—with its many benefits being increasingly corroborated through an array of scholarly approaches—is reaching a tipping point of being accepted, like physical exercise, as an essential element of well-being.” – Shalini Bahl
“Mindfulness is awareness that arises through paying attention, on purpose, in the present moment, non-judgmentally. It’s about knowing what is on your mind.” (Jon Kabat-Zinn). It has been shown to be highly related to the health and well-being of the individual. Mindfulness training has also been found to be effective for a large array of medical and psychiatric conditions, either stand-alone or in combination with more traditional therapies. As a result, mindfulness training has been called the third wave of therapies. In fact, though, little is known about how training improves mindfulness.
Neuroticism is considered a personality trait that is a lasting characteristic of the individual. It is characterized by negative feelings, repetitive thinking about the past (rumination), and worry about the future, moodiness and loneliness. It appears to be linked to vulnerability to stress. People who have this characteristic are not happy with life and have a low subjective sense of well-being and recognize that this state is unacceptable. There is some hope for people with high neuroticism as this relatively stable characteristic appears to be lessened by mindfulness training.
Well-being and neuroticism are two sides of a coin; one is a pleasant, healthful, and sought after state while the other is its opposite, an unpleasant, unhealthful, and avoided state. It is amazing that so little is known about treating neuroticism and promoting well-being. It is clear that mindfulness training helps with both. But mindfulness is a complex idea and there are many facets to mindfulness. Perhaps a better understanding of the role of these various facets in promoting well-being and treating neuroticism would lead to even better treatments.
In today’s Research News article “Dimensions of Mindfulness and Their Relations with Psychological Well-Being and Neuroticism.” See:
or see summary below or view the full text of the study at:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12671-016-0645-2
Iani and colleagues investigated the association of five different facets of mindfulness, Observing, Describing, Acting with Awareness, Non-Judging of Experience, and Non-reacting to Experience. They recruited normal adults aged 21 to 84 and had them complete paper and pencil scales of the five facets of mindfulness, 6 facets of neuroticism, including anxiety, anger, depression, self-consciousness, immoderation, and vulnerability, subjective well-being, including satisfaction with life and subjective happiness, and psychological well-being, including 6 facets of self-acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth. They then analyzed the associates between these variables.
They found that mindfulness in general and in particular describing and acting with awareness were strongly associated with psychological well-being, particularly with autonomy, personal growth, and purpose in life. Hence, the greater the ability to clearly describe experience yet act on it appropriately, the greater the positive functioning in life with autonomy, growth, and purpose. On the other hand, only the mindfulness facets of describing and nonreactivity were significantly correlated with both the subjective well-being facets of satisfaction with life and subjective happiness. So, being able to clearly describe experience yet not over-react to it appears to be very important for feeling good about life and general happiness. Neuroticism, particularly anxiety, depression, and vulnerability, was negatively associated with the mindfulness facets of nonreactivity and nonjudging. In other words, the more the individual does not judge nor over-react to experience the lower the levels of negative feelings.
These results are interesting and further refine our understanding of the relationship of mindfulness to well-being and neuroticism. In particular, the ability to function at a high level in life is associated with the ability to clearly describe experience yet act on it appropriately. While, feeling satisfied with life and happy is associated with the ability to clearly describe experience yet not over-react to it. Finally, less negative feelings are associated with the ability to not judge nor over-react to experience.
So, cultivate mindfulness in all its facets and have a life that is satisfying and happy, with fewer negative feelings, and functioning with autonomy, growth, and purpose. It is no wonder that mindfulness has become such an important skill for health and well-being in the modern world.
“Anxiety, depression, and stress/distress are different components of negative affect. When we combined each component of negative affect, we saw a small and consistent signal that any domain of negative affect is improved in mindfulness programs” – Madhav Goyal
CMCS – Center for Mindfulness and Contemplative Studies
This and other Contemplative Studies posts are also available on Google+ https://plus.google.com/106784388191201299496/posts and Twitter @MindfulResearch
Study Summary
Iani, L., Lauriola, M., Cafaro, V. et al. Dimensions of Mindfulness and Their Relations with Psychological Well-Being and Neuroticism. Mindfulness (2016). doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0645-2
Abstract
In this study we examined whether differences in the habitual use of mindfulness skills were associated with specific well-being and neuroticism aspects. Two hundred eleven volunteers aged 21–84 years completed measures of mindfulness, neuroticism, psychological well-being (PWB), and subjective well-being (SWB). Describing, observing, and acting with awareness (i.e., the mindfulness “what” skills) were positively correlated with personal growth, purpose in life, and autonomy (i.e., the “core” eudaimonic components of PWB). Nonreactivity and nonjudging (i.e., the mindfulness “how” skills) were negatively associated with neuroticism aspects, such as withdrawal (e.g., depression) and volatility (e.g., anger). Describing and nonreactivity were the only mindfulness skills significantly correlated with the SWB measures. Acting with awareness mediated the effect of both withdrawal and volatility on eudaimonic well-being outcomes. Describing had consistent mediation effects across all well-being measures, but only for the withdrawal aspect. Nonreactivity and nonjudging did not mediated withdrawal when considering eudaimonic well-being as outcomes. Mediation effects for nonjudging and nonreactivity were found between volatility and SWB markers as well as between volatility and self-acceptance, environmental mastery, and positive relations with others (i.e., the “other” eudaimonic PWB components). In sum, the mindfulness “what” skills were important for eudaimonic well-being, especially for internalizing individuals. Authors discuss the usefulness of a facet-level analysis of mindfulness for examining incremental validity of some facets over others in accounting for different well-being outcomes measures. Clinical implications are also discussed.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12671-016-0645-2